Academic Appeal Policy

1. Purpose and Scope:

• This Academic Appeal Policy outlines the procedures and guidelines for students seeking to appeal academic decisions, including but not limited to grades, course evaluations, academic misconduct penalties, and other related matters. The policy aims to provide a fair and transparent process for students to address concerns regarding academic decisions.

2. Grounds for Appeal:

• Grades: Students may appeal a grade if they believe that it was assigned unfairly, inaccurately, or in violation of the course syllabus or assessment criteria.
• Academic Misconduct: Students accused of academic misconduct have the right to appeal penalties if they can provide substantial evidence that the accusation was unfounded or the penalty was disproportionately severe.
• Course Evaluations: Appeals related to course evaluations, such as assignments, exams, or projects, can be submitted if the student can demonstrate that the assessment was not conducted in accordance with established procedures or guidelines.

3. Appeal Process:

• Informal Resolution: Students are encouraged to seek an informal resolution first by discussing concerns directly with the instructor, course coordinator, or relevant academic staff. Many issues can be resolved at this level through open communication and clarification.
• Formal Appeal: If an issue cannot be resolved informally, the student may initiate a formal appeal by submitting a written appeal to the [The Appeal Committee]. The appeal should include the following

1- A clear and concise statement of the grounds for the appeal.

2- Relevant supporting documentation, such as assignments, syllabus, or other relevant materials.

3- A description of the desired resolution or outcome.

• Submission Deadline: Formal appeals must be submitted within [14] days of receiving the academic decision that is being appealed.
• Appeal Review Process:
• Review Committee: The university will convene an Academic Appeal Review Committee comprising impartial faculty members and administrators who were not involved in the initial decision.
• Appeal Review: The committee will review the written appeal, supporting documentation, and any other relevant information. They may request additional information or clarification from the student, instructor, or any other involved parties.
• Decision: The committee will reach a decision based on a thorough review of the evidence. The decision will be communicated in writing to the student within [30] days of the appeal submission.

5. Appeal Outcomes:

•  Appeal Granted: If the appeal is granted, the university will take appropriate actions to address the concern, which may include revising the grade, modifying the penalty, or taking other corrective measures.
• Appeal Denied: If the appeal is denied, the student will be provided with a clear explanation of the decision and the reasons for the denial.

6. Final Appeal:

• UW Management : If the student is dissatisfied with the decision of the Academic Appeal Review Committee, they may submit a final appeal to [UW Management ]. The decision of the university leadership will be final.

7. Confidentiality:

• Confidentiality of Appeal Process: The university will maintain the confidentiality of all appeal proceedings, documents, and discussions to the extent permissible by law.

8. Conclusion:

• The Academic Appeal Policy is designed to uphold the principles of fairness, accountability, and transparency in academic decision-making. By adhering to this policy, students and the university community can address academic concerns effectively and ensure the integrity of the academic process.

This policy is subject to periodic review and may be updated as necessary to align with the university’s academic standards and evolving needs.

Date of Policy Implementation: [1/9/2023]

Last Revision Date: [1/9/2023]